As a dominant alpha-type kind of man, the Sigma man is often pursued with interest by the female sex.
For instance if a woman ASKS YOU multiple questions being a naturally-dominant Alpha or Sigma man like, "Do you have kids?", she's either disqualifying or qualifying you to be her sperm donor surrogate for high genetic quality offspring of kids WITH HER because chances are she has an "Alpha fetish" and is approaching her late twenties to early, mid or late thirties where her natural biological time clock for having children is drawing near to a close (not including miraculous births of children by elder woman in their forties and beyond after the manner of Abraham and Sarah...).
Now, ultimately, instinctively a woman knows a naturally-dominant man as Alpha and Sigma men may or may not "do right by her" in the biological and traditionally masculine gender role of "Provider and Protector" in the relationship with her in exchange for a woman's sexual intercourse; however what a woman TRULY WANTS from the naturally-dominant Alpha men is superior ALPHA SEED to sire healthy "superior" offspring by.
Basically a woman wants to have Alpha or Sigma's kids with the natural alpha dominance gene of good health, fit healthy body, high intelligence, good looks and all the naturally favourable positive healthy attributes many natural-born Alpha and Sigma men are born with.
The woman ideally wants to have her children by the BEST, MOST POWERFUL man she can get to make a baby with and THAT'S where the Alpha or Sigma man comes in for the baby-making process. All the other "males" don't matter in her hypergamous, instinctual primal mind.
She knows that such Alpha or Sigma men may or may not be around her and their bastard children (if they don't marry); but in the end of the bargain for her; she wants to be among her peers of "single mothers" in "single motherhood" with the best, higher genetic quality children she can bare.
If she can conceive a child with the man she considers the best biologically genetic material for a sperm donor she can hustle; she'll go with it because she wants to have the strong Alpha man's child and not the doormat, weak beta man's kid whether the Alpha/Sigma man is in her life or not...
It's the way it is in the discriminating logic of unrestrained, hypergamous instinct of reproducing with the best mate she can.
Even many men naturally and instinctively want to make babies with the "hottest" most beautiful, physically-attractive women they can find and try to win her over their other male competitors vying for her attention.
Because most men are Delta males and Beta males, they don't possess that naturally-expressed natural alpha dominance gene that gives women the "vagina tingles" that attracts her.
Nevertheless, in nearly every man's genetic lineage there is at least one Alpha or Sigma forefather and so the natural alpha dominance gene trait is in many men's genetic makeup although it is then an UNEXPRESSED recessive genetic trait by birth.
Usually a surefire highly likely guarantee a man is born an Alpha or a Sigma male is if he is the FIRSTBORN son of an Alpha or Sigma father.
Now, the Alpha or Sigma father that has the naturally-expressed alpha dominance genetic trait expressed is very likely to give "alpha seed" in the conception of his firstborn son. I think the likelihood of having more "naturally-alpha" sons decrease or may "fluctuate" in chance after the firstborn son's birth. I'm not exactly sure why this is the case (and God-willing, I'll look more into it later perhaps...), but from personal real life experience this is often the way this works out.
I say this, because I am the "product" of an extraverted Alpha father and I am his firstborn son. Out of all his children (all my siblings are "sisters"), I am his only son and I take after the hereditary naturally-alpha nature of my dad. He is extraverted social Alpha.
The only thing different is my development because of my unideal life circumstances growing up I became more "socially-withdrawn" or introverted in temperament; hence my biological, physiological development into the Sigma man I am now.
Thus, to the opposite sex, depending on the good or bad motives of Alpha or Sigma men, the bottom-line for the females is to get "alpha seed" for "alpha babies" because there's no guarantee the man may or may not be in the woman and his kids lives but in the end, if she's gonna get pregnant and have kids she wants to have kids with the most biologically-superior" may she can get with; even if it's a temporary sex fling.
Ever wonder why all the "good men" women want (and can never easily acquire out of free will) are NEVER the "sperm donors" for children women would want them to be? (He'd have to be very desperate or have a last resort purpose agenda to want to reproduce...)
It's because these men have biologically GOOD SEED for a woman's fertile eggs to create healthy babies with.
Shoot, either we don't know or you never hear any rumours or things about men like Leonardo DiCaprio (a Sigma), Matt Damon (an Alpha) or any other naturally-dominant, successful (unmarried) man basically "throwing away his good sperm" to the masses of womankind via sperm donation out of wedlock?
A naturally-dominant man of his free will would rather have sex (in marriage or outside of marriage) with his choice of finest female and make the babies the "good ol' fashion" way than freely and indiscriminately "give away" one of his most precious natural resources he has; because sperm or "semen" is SEED that creates children. That's why God says MASTURBATION and JERKING is MASTURBATION and JERKING is WRONG.
It's like thinking every physically-attractive woman men would want to bang to say, "I'll have sex with any and every man for free" and she gets nothing in return? Only a truly naïve, ignorant narrative like this is not meant to be believable in the real world we live in.
It's not supposed to be this way, but this is how spiritually-unrestrained, primal nature has it's own way if man does not follow GOD'S WAY. Amen.
For instance if a woman ASKS YOU multiple questions being a naturally-dominant Alpha or Sigma man like, "Do you have kids?", she's either disqualifying or qualifying you to be her sperm donor surrogate for high genetic quality offspring of kids WITH HER because chances are she has an "Alpha fetish" and is approaching her late twenties to early, mid or late thirties where her natural biological time clock for having children is drawing near to a close (not including miraculous births of children by elder woman in their forties and beyond after the manner of Abraham and Sarah...).
Now, ultimately, instinctively a woman knows a naturally-dominant man as Alpha and Sigma men may or may not "do right by her" in the biological and traditionally masculine gender role of "Provider and Protector" in the relationship with her in exchange for a woman's sexual intercourse; however what a woman TRULY WANTS from the naturally-dominant Alpha men is superior ALPHA SEED to sire healthy "superior" offspring by.
Basically a woman wants to have Alpha or Sigma's kids with the natural alpha dominance gene of good health, fit healthy body, high intelligence, good looks and all the naturally favourable positive healthy attributes many natural-born Alpha and Sigma men are born with.
The woman ideally wants to have her children by the BEST, MOST POWERFUL man she can get to make a baby with and THAT'S where the Alpha or Sigma man comes in for the baby-making process. All the other "males" don't matter in her hypergamous, instinctual primal mind.
She knows that such Alpha or Sigma men may or may not be around her and their bastard children (if they don't marry); but in the end of the bargain for her; she wants to be among her peers of "single mothers" in "single motherhood" with the best, higher genetic quality children she can bare.
If she can conceive a child with the man she considers the best biologically genetic material for a sperm donor she can hustle; she'll go with it because she wants to have the strong Alpha man's child and not the doormat, weak beta man's kid whether the Alpha/Sigma man is in her life or not...
It's the way it is in the discriminating logic of unrestrained, hypergamous instinct of reproducing with the best mate she can.
Even many men naturally and instinctively want to make babies with the "hottest" most beautiful, physically-attractive women they can find and try to win her over their other male competitors vying for her attention.
Because most men are Delta males and Beta males, they don't possess that naturally-expressed natural alpha dominance gene that gives women the "vagina tingles" that attracts her.
Nevertheless, in nearly every man's genetic lineage there is at least one Alpha or Sigma forefather and so the natural alpha dominance gene trait is in many men's genetic makeup although it is then an UNEXPRESSED recessive genetic trait by birth.
Usually a surefire highly likely guarantee a man is born an Alpha or a Sigma male is if he is the FIRSTBORN son of an Alpha or Sigma father.
Now, the Alpha or Sigma father that has the naturally-expressed alpha dominance genetic trait expressed is very likely to give "alpha seed" in the conception of his firstborn son. I think the likelihood of having more "naturally-alpha" sons decrease or may "fluctuate" in chance after the firstborn son's birth. I'm not exactly sure why this is the case (and God-willing, I'll look more into it later perhaps...), but from personal real life experience this is often the way this works out.
I say this, because I am the "product" of an extraverted Alpha father and I am his firstborn son. Out of all his children (all my siblings are "sisters"), I am his only son and I take after the hereditary naturally-alpha nature of my dad. He is extraverted social Alpha.
The only thing different is my development because of my unideal life circumstances growing up I became more "socially-withdrawn" or introverted in temperament; hence my biological, physiological development into the Sigma man I am now.
Thus, to the opposite sex, depending on the good or bad motives of Alpha or Sigma men, the bottom-line for the females is to get "alpha seed" for "alpha babies" because there's no guarantee the man may or may not be in the woman and his kids lives but in the end, if she's gonna get pregnant and have kids she wants to have kids with the most biologically-superior" may she can get with; even if it's a temporary sex fling.
Ever wonder why all the "good men" women want (and can never easily acquire out of free will) are NEVER the "sperm donors" for children women would want them to be? (He'd have to be very desperate or have a last resort purpose agenda to want to reproduce...)
It's because these men have biologically GOOD SEED for a woman's fertile eggs to create healthy babies with.
Shoot, either we don't know or you never hear any rumours or things about men like Leonardo DiCaprio (a Sigma), Matt Damon (an Alpha) or any other naturally-dominant, successful (unmarried) man basically "throwing away his good sperm" to the masses of womankind via sperm donation out of wedlock?
A naturally-dominant man of his free will would rather have sex (in marriage or outside of marriage) with his choice of finest female and make the babies the "good ol' fashion" way than freely and indiscriminately "give away" one of his most precious natural resources he has; because sperm or "semen" is SEED that creates children. That's why God says MASTURBATION and JERKING is MASTURBATION and JERKING is WRONG.
It's like thinking every physically-attractive woman men would want to bang to say, "I'll have sex with any and every man for free" and she gets nothing in return? Only a truly naïve, ignorant narrative like this is not meant to be believable in the real world we live in.
It's not supposed to be this way, but this is how spiritually-unrestrained, primal nature has it's own way if man does not follow GOD'S WAY. Amen.
